Authorship Research Integrity Libguides At Cold Spring Harbor

Leo Migdal

-Dec 5, 2025, 8:36 PM

authorship research integrity libguides at cold spring harbor

One of the most commonly-used criteria for determining authorship is the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations. They suggest that authorship be based on these 4 criteria: Shamoo & Resnik (2022), authors of Responsible Conduct of Research, argue that these guidelines are hard to apply to publications without data collection. They recommend that authorship in these cases should be "based on a significant intellectual contribution to the activities involved in research, such as literature review, argument analysis, writing, mathematical modeling, etc." (Shamoo & Resnik,... 111). Research at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) must be conducted with the highest standards of scientific and ethical integrity, adhering to the core values of excellence, pushing frontiers, collaboration, and education.

The National Science and Technology Council in "A Framework for Federal Scientific Integrity Policy and Practice" (p. 8) defines scientific integrity as: To instill and maintain the highest standards for scientific integrity, CSHL requires training in the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) for undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows. RCR training is required of individuals receiving funding from the NIH or NSF. Please visit the Research Compliance Intranet Website for additional information about this training. One of the foundational ways that researchers can uphold scientific integrity is to educate themselves on the best practices in the responsible conduct of research (RCR).

This guide is not a substitute for an RCR course but offers additional information and resources for the CSHL scientific community for major topics in the responsible conduct of research: The CSHL Research Misconduct Policy (p. 3) defines research misconduct as: Peer review occurs when researchers review the scientific publications of other researchers to ensure that they meet the standards and quality expected in a scientific discipline. This process of having other experts objectively evaluate the research helps to increase the trust in the scientific findings. Peer review is also used to evaluate federal grant proposals and tenure/promotion decisions.

CSHL PIs have access to the iThenticate tool to compare submissions to the iThenticate database that includes web pages, journals, and scholarly publications. iThenticate generates a Similarity Report which provides a percentage of how much of the text matches their sources. As a part of the report, you can review the different sources that are similar to the text of the submission. This tool checks for text plagiarism. This page provides step-by-step instructions for: Step 1.

You should have received an email invitation from noreply@turnitin.com. If you cannot find an email, please check your Mimecast first, and then email kmcguire@cshl.edu. Click the "Activate Your Account" button in the email. Step 2. You will be asked to enter a username, password, confirm your password, and agree to the Terms & Conditions. Once you have filled in this information, click "Create Account".

Step 3. Now that your account is activated, you can upload documents into the iThenticate tool by navigating to your workspace. Research assistance, subject guides, and useful resources compiled by your friendly librarians. Know what we know – find it in LibGuides! CSHL Library has a PRUSA i3 3D printer which is able to print objects in PLA plastic. The library gives instruction in 3D printing, so that you will be able to use the machine for training or protoyping purposes.

See the 3D Printing at CSHL LibGuide for more information. Academic Tree is an umbrella website for creating scientific “family” trees, phylogenies of scientists. While there are numerous different -TREEs, each is just a branch of the greater single tree, and all are interconnected. See the Academic Tree for more information. In today’s complicated world of scholarly publishing it’s important that all authors understand the rights they have and how they can preserve them to ensure they can freely distribute their works. See the Author Rights and Copyright for more information.

Some journals do not allow AI tools helping you write a manuscript, while others will require that you disclosed that you used AI. It is important to check the policy of any journal you want to submit an article to. Here are some policies of common journals that CSHL researchers published in: "AI-assisted technologies [such as large language models (LLMs), chatbots, and image creators] do not meet the Science journals’ criteria for authorship and therefore may not be listed as authors or coauthors, nor may sources... Authors who use AI-assisted technologies as components of their research study or as aids in the writing or presentation of the manuscript should note this in the cover letter and in the acknowledgments section... Detailed information should be provided in the methods section: The full prompt used in the production of the work, as well as the AI tool and its version, should be disclosed.

Authors are accountable for the accuracy of the work and for ensuring that there is no plagiarism. They must also ensure that all sources are appropriately cited and should carefully review the work to guard against bias that may be introduced by AI. Editors may decline to move forward with manuscripts if AI is used inappropriately. Reviewers may not use AI technology in generating or writing their reviews because this could breach the confidentiality of the manuscript. AI-generated images and other multimedia are not permitted in the Science journals without explicit permission from the editors. Exceptions may be granted in certain situations—e.g., for images and/or videos in manuscripts specifically about AI and/or machine learning.

Such exceptions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and should be disclosed at the time of submission. The Science journals recognize that this area is rapidly developing, and our position on AI-generated multimedia may change with the evolution of copyright law and industry standards on ethical use." "Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. The use of an LLM (or other AI-tool) for “AI assisted copy editing” purposes does not need to be declared.

In this context, we define the term "AI assisted copy editing" as AI-assisted improvements to human-generated texts for readability and style, and to ensure that the texts are free of errors in grammar, spelling,... These AI-assisted improvements may include wording and formatting changes to the texts, but do not include generative editorial work and autonomous content creation. In all cases, there must be human accountability for the final version of the text and agreement from the authors that the edits reflect their original work. The fast moving area of generative AI image creation has resulted in novel legal copyright and research integrity issues. As publishers, we strictly follow existing copyright law and best practices regarding publication ethics. While legal issues relating to AI-generated images and videos remain broadly unresolved, Springer Nature journals are unable to permit its use for publication.

As part of CSHL Research Operations, the Research Compliance Office plays a critical role in ensuring that all CSHL research activities adhere to applicable laws, regulations, ethical standards, and institutional policies. The Research Compliance Office provides support and training to the CSHL scientific community towards safe and ethical conduct of research, including areas such as biosafety, protection of human subjects, animal care and use, and... Additionally, the Research Compliance Office provides regulatory guidance and administrative support to CSHL’s Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and Conflict of Interest Committee (COI). Questions about any of these committees or the Research Compliance Office should be directed to: ResearchCompliance@cshl.edu This could involve situations in which an employee has a relationship with an outside organization or has an opportunity that influences their personal gain (directly or indirectly) as well as adversely impacts CSHL in... There are numerous situations where a conflict of interest could arise and impact your vested interest in being a CSHL employee, but this guide will specifically focus on research transparency involving scientific publications.

For more detailed explanations, please see below. In terms of scientific publishing, many journals require a conflict/declaration of interest statement to address if there is a potential situation where the authors may have personal or financial gain with the indicated publication. These typically consist of consultation fees, being an advisor for a commercial company, involvement in associated stocks/shares with a specific company, and involvement with associated patents/commercial technological advances and related royalties. Example: Dr. Adrian Gomez (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) has received financial support from his involvement with (Insert name of company / organization) for service as a consultant. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Policies - Guide to editorial policies and statement of conflicts of interest form.

Authorship Research Integrity Libguides At Cold Spring Harbor

People Also Search

One Of The Most Commonly-used Criteria For Determining Authorship Is

The National Science And Technology Council In "A Framework For

This Guide Is Not A Substitute For An RCR Course

CSHL PIs Have Access To The IThenticate Tool To Compare

You Should Have Received An Email Invitation From Noreply@turnitin.com. If