Building Bridges Not Walls Social Media And Community Engagement
This paper outlines a collaborative university-community initiative, Building Bridges, Not Walls: The Democracy and Diversity Project. Building Bridges emphasizes the critical role of community engagement in reducing barriers to democratic participation, social equity, and student success. In pursuit of these outcomes, we present a model of a sustainable, accessible, and cross-disciplinary network of sequenced engagement projects. The interconnected cross-curricular projects are mutually designed and implemented with community partners, providing an emulatable case study to promote civic engagement in multiple contexts and communities. Building Bridges mobilizes sociological theory to consider the question of how universities can be regularly engaged with our communities in a consistent, collaborative, and sustainable manner. Informed by 'service sociology' literature we outline four stages of our Building Bridges model: design, implementation, evaluation, and reflective revision.
These stages are concretized through application to our public university and community, providing a template for other universities and communities to follow. We propose integrated engagement as a means for universities to combat challenges to equity and diversity. As our communities face unprecedented tests to our democratic institutions, we contend that community engagement is higher education’s keenest armament. Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Augustana University Clinical Psychologist, Andwell Health Partners, Therapy and Early Learning Services USM Graduate 2022, University of Southern Maine
Anderson, D., & Harris, B. (2005). Teaching social welfare policy: A comparison of two pedagogical approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(3), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2005.200303120 Social media has undergone a remarkable transformation since its inception, evolving from simple networking sites to complex ecosystems that facilitate global communication and community building.
Initially, platforms like Friendster and MySpace allowed users to connect with friends and share personal updates. However, the landscape has dramatically shifted with the advent of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and more recently, TikTok and Clubhouse. These platforms have not only expanded the ways in which users interact but have also become powerful tools for brands, organizations, and individuals to engage with communities on a global scale. The evolution of social media is marked by increased interactivity, multimedia content, and real-time communication. This progression has enabled users to form communities based on shared interests, values, and goals, transcending geographical boundaries. As social media continues to evolve, it offers unprecedented opportunities for community engagement, allowing for more inclusive and diverse interactions.
In the digital age, community engagement refers to the active participation and interaction of individuals within a virtual community. It involves creating meaningful connections, fostering dialogue, and encouraging collaboration among members. Unlike traditional community engagement, which often relies on physical presence, digital community engagement leverages online platforms to bring people together, regardless of their location. Key elements of community engagement include a sense of belonging, shared values, and mutual support. In the digital realm, these elements are facilitated through social media features such as groups, forums, and live chats. These tools enable users to collaborate, share experiences, and address common challenges, thereby fostering a sense of identity and connection within the community.
In today’s interconnected world, the metaphor of building bridges rather than walls is particularly relevant. Social media has the potential to break down barriers and create inclusive communities that celebrate diversity and promote understanding. By building bridges, we can connect with individuals from different backgrounds, cultures, and perspectives, enriching our own experiences and broadening our horizons. In an era of growing interconnectedness, the concepts of public diplomacy and soft power have experienced substantial evolution over the past decade. The concept of ‘public diplomacy,’ a term coined by a former US diplomat, Edmund Gullion (in the 1960s), initially derived from the ‘propaganda’ that refers to the idea of a country’s (or the government’s)... However, over the years, the concept of ‘public diplomacy’ has developed a different meaning (or practice): in current content, the term is often refers to the ways the individual states (or governments) communicate with...
Traditionally, this has often been used for the foreign policy purposes of the respective country, which is used to achieve national interest(s) of the state. Soft power, a term coined by Joseph Nye, refers to a country’s ability to attract and influence (other nations) without using coercive (or hard) power, relying on cultural appeal, political values,policies, etc., to influence... In the digital age, social media platforms have transformed how nations practice public diplomacy and leverage soft power. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTTikTok,, and TikTok etc., have provided governments and organizations with unprecedented tools to engage directly with people around the globe. As a result, in modern days, contries also leverage the entertainment industry as a soft power tool by exporting cultural products like films, music, and media to shape global perceptions, promote national identity, boost... The rise of these digital tools marks a new era in diplomacy—one that is immediate, interactive, and borderless.
As governments and diplomats embrace social media, the ability to project soft power has grown exponentially. However, this new frontier of digital public diplomacy also comes with challenges, such as misinformation, backlash, and ethical concerns. This article explores how digital public diplomacy has redefined soft power, offering both opportunities and risks for nations as they navigate this dynamic landscape. Traditional public diplomacy relied on established forms of communication, such as radio broadcasts, cultural exchange programs, official statements, and international conferences. Countries sought to shape their global image through carefully curated content distributed via traditional media outlets. For instance, the Voice of America radio service and British Council cultural programs were effective tools for promoting American and British values during the 20th century.
In our journey through the diverse landscapes of human communities, we encounter two starkly contrasting realities: the enriching, vibrant life in a diverse community, and the stifling, tense atmosphere of a closed, hostile community. Understanding the profound impact these environments have on individuals and society as a whole is crucial in today's globalized world. This article explores the ramifications of these community dynamics, emphasizing the need for embracing diversity and openness for a progressive and harmonious society. Living in a diverse community is akin to being part of a rich tapestry woven with threads of various colors, each representing different cultures, backgrounds, and viewpoints. Such communities are not just melting pots of culture but also hotbeds of creativity and innovation. The exchange of ideas and perspectives fosters an environment where learning and growth are constant, and empathy and understanding are nurtured.
When people from different walks of life come together, they bring unique solutions to the table, leading to innovative problem-solving that benefits the entire community. In stark contrast, closed, hostile communities are characterized by a lack of openness and acceptance. These communities often suffer from limited perspectives and prejudices, leading to discrimination and social strife. The absence of trust and cooperation stunts not only personal growth but also communal progress. In such an environment, fear and intolerance can thrive, creating a space where cultural exchange is non-existent, and innovative ideas are stifled. The lack of diversity leads to a monocultural mindset, impeding the community's ability to adapt and evolve in a rapidly changing world.
The juxtaposition of these two types of communities highlights the importance of building bridges rather than walls. To foster a society that is both progressive and harmonious, it is essential to cultivate environments that embrace diversity and reject hostility. Promoting Cultural Exchange: Encouraging interactions among diverse groups can break down barriers and dispel misconceptions. In an increasingly complex and often divided world, the temptation can be to retreat, to build walls, and to focus solely on our individual paths. Yet, true strength, innovation, and resilience are rarely found in isolation. They emerge from the powerful act of connection – from building bridges that span differences and foster genuine, authentic communities.
As we reflect on the journey of creating vibrant, inclusive spaces, like our global community of women in tech, it's clear: hope, action, and a commitment to collective thriving are the cornerstones. This isn't about ignoring the world's challenges; it's about actively demonstrating an alternative to silence, hate, and injustice through our collective stories and shared efforts. So, how do we intentionally cultivate these kinds of authentic communities? It starts with a quick guide for bridge-building. Walls go up when we define who's "in" and who's "out." Bridges are built when we recognize the inherent value in every individual and actively seek diverse voices. Authentic communities aren't homogeneous; they are vibrant tapestries woven from myriad backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences.
Actionable Step: Challenge your own assumptions about who "fits." Actively seek out and invite people from different departments, industries, demographics, and viewpoints to participate. The broader the base, the stronger the bridge. As our societies grow and change, the concept of community takes on new complexity. The traditional boundaries that once defined a community—geographical location, shared values, common interests—are no longer the only factors at play. Today, community is as much about diversity as it is about similarity, and the success of our communities is directly tied to how well they can foster inclusivity. This isn't a task that falls solely to a few; it’s a shared duty and a golden opportunity.
In this thought leadership article, we will discuss how to create and sustain inclusive communities in diverse settings, underscoring the importance of recognizing, valuing, and weaving together our differences. Our goal is not to simply coexist but to thrive through the richness that diversity brings. We'll survey practical strategies and tools that local leaders, businesses, and social activists can employ to make their communities more inclusive. Modern communities are portraits of diversity, with a spectrum of races, ethnicities, beliefs, sexual orientations, and abilities. This mosaic is an asset, not a liability. Inclusive communities understand that diversity isn't just about demographic statistics; it's about creating an environment where everyone can contribute, grow, and belong.
In an inclusive community, individuals don't have to conform; they are embraced and celebrated for all that makes them unique. Inclusivity is not a passive state of mutual cohabitation. It requires actively promoting understanding, tolerance, and equity. By doing so, we set the stage for something more profound than simple harmony—we pave the way for shared accomplishments and an environment where differences are seen as engines of innovation. At the heart of every inclusive community are leaders who are willing to listen, learn, and lead. Empathy is the lighthouse guiding the way, illuminating paths that connect different individuals and groups within the community.
By practicing empathy, community leaders can build trust, open lines of communication, and foster an environment where people feel free to express themselves without fear of reproach or exclusion. Every community, no matter how diverse, experiences moments that bring people together—rebuilding after a crisis, gathering at a local rally, or advocating for meaningful change. These moments reveal a simple truth: our strength lies in connection. Resilience isn’t just about individuals weathering storms; it’s about communities working together, weaving diverse perspectives into shared solutions. Yet, in a world that often leans toward division, the choice to build bridges—to listen, to empathize, and to act collectively—is both a challenge and a necessity. When we come together, not just to air differences but to understand them, we build something far stronger than any one voice could achieve alone.
I saw this firsthand while working with a city at a crossroads, as it sought to balance growth with its deeply rooted identity. Thanks for reading Brittle Views! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Resilient policies are the bridges of our society. They span divides, connecting communities while adapting to shifting landscapes. These policies aren’t static; they evolve, responding to new challenges and diverse voices.
People Also Search
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: Mobilizing Community Engagement to Promote ...
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: Social Media and Community Engagement
- Building bridges, not walls, in the era of social media | Meer
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: The Impact of Community Dynamics on Progress
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: Your Quick Guide for Authentic Community
- "Build Bridges, Not Walls" - A UMass public art and engagement ...
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: Cultivating Inclusive Communities in ...
- Building Bridges, Not Walls: Inclusivity in the Digital Age
- Building Bridges, Not Walls - by Robert M. Ford
- Social Media & Community: Building Bridges Online | Kite Metric
This Paper Outlines A Collaborative University-community Initiative, Building Bridges, Not
This paper outlines a collaborative university-community initiative, Building Bridges, Not Walls: The Democracy and Diversity Project. Building Bridges emphasizes the critical role of community engagement in reducing barriers to democratic participation, social equity, and student success. In pursuit of these outcomes, we present a model of a sustainable, accessible, and cross-disciplinary network...
These Stages Are Concretized Through Application To Our Public University
These stages are concretized through application to our public university and community, providing a template for other universities and communities to follow. We propose integrated engagement as a means for universities to combat challenges to equity and diversity. As our communities face unprecedented tests to our democratic institutions, we contend that community engagement is higher education’...
Anderson, D., & Harris, B. (2005). Teaching Social Welfare Policy:
Anderson, D., & Harris, B. (2005). Teaching social welfare policy: A comparison of two pedagogical approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(3), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2005.200303120 Social media has undergone a remarkable transformation since its inception, evolving from simple networking sites to complex ecosystems that facilitate global communication and community building...
Initially, Platforms Like Friendster And MySpace Allowed Users To Connect
Initially, platforms like Friendster and MySpace allowed users to connect with friends and share personal updates. However, the landscape has dramatically shifted with the advent of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and more recently, TikTok and Clubhouse. These platforms have not only expanded the ways in which users interact but have also become powerful tools for brands, organizations, and individu...
In The Digital Age, Community Engagement Refers To The Active
In the digital age, community engagement refers to the active participation and interaction of individuals within a virtual community. It involves creating meaningful connections, fostering dialogue, and encouraging collaboration among members. Unlike traditional community engagement, which often relies on physical presence, digital community engagement leverages online platforms to bring people t...