Coalition Of Conservative Groups Challenges Nab S Push For Atsc 3 0 Ma

A coalition of 13 conservative organizations has filed formal opposition with the Federal Communications Commission against the National Association of Broadcasters‘ petition to mandate adoption of ATSC 3.0 technology, arguing that market forces should... The July 10 filing, led by Americans for Tax Reform and including groups such as Digital Liberty, the Innovation Economy Alliance and Citizens Against Government Waste, contends that the current voluntary adoption approach has... “More than three out of every four Americans have access to ATSC 3.0,” the coalition states in their letter to the FCC. “It is available in more than 80 markets in parallel to ATSC 1.0 technology delivering digital television.” The opposition represents the latest salvo in an escalating debate over the future of Next Generation Television technology. Former FCC commissioner criticizes proposed NextGen TV mandates

Six groups said they had different perspectives but ‘one goal’ in urging the regulator to ‘deny NAB’s requests’ When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. WASHINGTON—Representatives from six trade groups representing tech, pay TV, broadband, LPTV and other sectors recently met with Federal Communications Commission staff to detail their opposition to the "Petition for Rulemaking and Future of Television... “This diverse group of stakeholders represents different aspects of the television marketplace, and each is on record individually opposing NAB’s Petition,” the groups said in a letter to the FCC summarizing the meeting. “Each participating organization has a different perspective, but we all have a common goal.

We respectfully urge the Commission to deny NAB’s requests.” In a February filing, the NAB proposed the FCC mandate a two-phase transition deadline. In the first phase of the NAB proposal, full-power stations in the top 55 markets (reaching about 70% of viewers) would be required to transition fully to ATSC 3.0 (i.e., end ATSC 1.0 simulcasting)... In the second phase of the NAB proposal, stations in the remaining markets would be required to transition fully to ATSC 3.0 in February 2030. The NAB is also asking that ATSC 3.0 tuners be mandated in all new TV sets. Public Knowledge, along with Open Technology Institute at New America (OTI), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Consumer Reports, Access Humboldt, and Media Council Hawaii, filed comments before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the Petition...

The comments urge the FCC to not allow the NAB’s proposal for a nationwide transition from ATSC 1.0 to ATSC 3.0, highlighting the proposal’s potential harms to competition and to consumers. Conservative groups and the Consumer Technology Association argued in reply comments filed by Friday’s deadline that a mandatory transition to ATSC 3.0, as NAB proposed, would fly in the face of FCC Chairman Brendan... In its own comments, NAB argued that a mandate is necessary for broadcast competition, saying it's no different from the DTV transition. Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today! “At a moment when Chairman Carr and the FCC seek to slash regulatory red tape, the NAB proposal would encumber one of the most dynamic sectors of America’s economy in more red tape,” said...

NAB’s plan “imposes a heavy-handed regulatory scheme that conflicts with the Trump Administration and FCC’s laudable commitment to deregulation, competition, and market innovation,” said the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. Digital Liberty pointed out that NAB’s call to force a transition runs exactly counter to its arguments for ownership deregulation. "Granting the petition would only impose on other market actors the same type of outdated, needless regulation that afflicts the broadcast industry at present, a regulatory capture play that no agency of the federal... Let’s call this what it is: An assault on consumer freedom.” The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has taken a significant step toward ensuring a smooth transition to ATSC 3.0 by filing a petition urging the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a clear timeline... This move aims to address the growing uncertainty surrounding the transition process and provide broadcasters—particularly Low Power Television (LPTV) stations—with the guidance they need to remain competitive in the evolving digital landscape.

ATSC 3.0, also known as NextGen TV, is a transformative technology that enhances over-the-air broadcasting with improved video quality, immersive audio, better signal reception, and interactive features. The standard also allows for advanced emergency alerting and datacasting capabilities, which could revolutionize how broadcasters engage with their audiences. For LPTV stations, the adoption of ATSC 3.0 presents both challenges and opportunities. While the new standard promises better service and monetization potential, the lack of a definitive transition timeline has left many stations hesitant to invest in upgrades. The NAB’s petition seeks to eliminate this uncertainty by pushing for a structured, well-defined migration plan. The NAB’s petition highlights several critical areas that require immediate regulatory attention:

A Firm Transition Deadline: NAB is requesting the FCC set a clear deadline for the industry-wide adoption of ATSC 3.0, ensuring that broadcasters have a predictable roadmap. OTI, along with Public Knowledge, Consumer Reports, and other public interest groups, oppose the National Association of Broadcaster’s (NABO) proposal to mandate a nationwide transition to a new digital over-the-air TV standard (ATSC 3.0)—thereby... NAB’s plan is deeply flawed and prioritizes broadcaster profits and control at the expense of the public interest. The Commission must not authorize this under the guise of modernization. The public interest cannot be served by creating technological barriers to reception of free broadcast signals. Historically, the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) broadcast priorities have included the universality, affordability, and openness of access to over-the-air content.

Any mandatory transition to a new standard must preserve these values. It must ensure universal and equitable access to service; strong and enforceable public interest obligations; affordable and interoperable reception equipment; non-discriminatory access to devices and content; robust privacy protections; and the safeguarding of fair... Unless these concerns are addressed, we urge the Commission to reject the NAB petition. The proposal by NAB to mandate a nationwide transition to ATSC 3.0 by 2030 imposes significant and unjustifiable burdens on American consumers. While broadcasters stand to benefit from expanded commercial opportunities—including targeted advertising, datacasting, and retransmission fees—consumers are asked to absorb the costs of new equipment, navigate technical complexities, and potentially lose access to free over-the-air... This cost-shifting is neither equitable nor consistent with the Commission’s longstanding obligation to ensure universal, affordable access to essential communications services.

It also marks a shift in policy from the previous analog-to-digital broadcast transition, where Congress, in the Digital Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005, made a subsidy available to every household to cover... For millions of Americans—particularly those in low-income households, rural communities, tribal areas, or elder populations—broadcast television remains a primary or exclusive source of news, educational content, emergency alerts, and entertainment. These communities are least likely to upgrade their hardware frequently and are disproportionately affected by costs associated with new tuners, incompatible televisions, or internet-enabled features. These issues are compounded by the pervasive and inappropriate incorporation of Digital Rights Management (DRM) into the ATSC 3.0 standard, which fundamentally contradicts the Commission’s mandate to promote access, localism, and diversity. To that end, while the NAB’s petition should be denied, the FCC should condition any eventual transition on the implementation of a robust consumer protection plan, including: Another day, another reflexive, innovation-blocking FCC filing from the usual suspects – cable lobbyists, legacy advocacy groups and industry players who oppose anything that might strengthen free, over-the-air broadcasting or challenge the dominance of...

Their latest attack on ATSC 3.0 – the Next Gen TV broadcast standard already delivering improved video, immersive audio, innovative interactive features, and more – is as predictable as it is tired. Let’s be clear: these groups aren’t protecting the public. They’re protecting their turf. Their familiar talking points are still wrong: Here’s what’s really happening: broadcasters are working to preserve and strengthen free television for everyone, while our competitors are busy finding new ways to extract more money from viewers every month by diverting viewers... CTA, for one, uses faulty logic to suggest ATSC 3.0 tuners are responsible for an $80 price difference between TVs with Next Gen TV capability and those without, ignoring the fact that those models...

For example, many of the TVs that include Next Gen tuners also offer 8K video, higher-end display technologies, high refresh rates and upgraded speakers. The manufacturers who are actively embracing ATSC 3.0 – many of whom are ironically “represented” by CTA – are delivering real value to consumers and helping to modernize free, over-the-air television. We should be celebrating this innovation – not undermining it. To the contrary, innovation is happening and it’s threatening those eager to protect their profits. ATSC 3.0 brings flexible, secure, IP-based broadcasting to viewers without the strings of Big Tech. The objections about digital rights management (DRM) are driven by fear of losing control, not genuine concern for open ecosystems.

We also wonder if NCTA bothered checking with its members before joining a filing arguing that encryption is bad. The National Association of Broadcasters responded sharply to industry opposition against its ATSC 3.0 transition petition, accusing cable companies and consumer electronics groups of “protecting their turf” rather than serving the public interest. In a July 7 blog post, NAB Chief Legal Officer Rick Kaplan dismissed objections raised by six industry groups during a recent Federal Communications Commission meeting as “reflexive, innovation-blocking” efforts from “the usual suspects.”... Six industry groups tell FCC to reject NAB’s ATSC 3.0 transition plan NAB’s petition requests a two-phase timeline requiring full-power stations in the top 55 markets to end ATSC 1.0 simulcasting by February 2028, with remaining markets following by February 2030. The proposal also seeks mandatory ATSC 3.0 tuners in new television sets.

Kaplan challenged the coalition’s cost arguments, particularly CTA’s analysis showing ATSC 3.0-capable televisions cost an average of $157 more than ATSC 1.0-only models. Save this article for later! Login or create a Free Member Profile to bookmark it. A coalition of six industry groups representing consumer electronics, pay TV operators and broadcasters formally opposed the National Association of Broadcasters’ petition for a mandatory transition to ATSC 3.0 during a June 27 meeting... This article was originally posted on newscaststudio.com In a regulatory push that could fundamentally alter the American television landscape, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has formally petitioned the Federal Communications Commission to establish firm deadlines for ending ATSC 1.0 broadcasts.

While presented as a technological upgrade, industry experts warn this transition could potentially transform free over-the-air television into a subscription model through encryption capabilities built into the NextGen TV standard. The broadcast industry has reached what FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr described as a "break glass moment," prompting the NAB to propose a decisive timeline for completing the transition from traditional broadcasting to the NextGen... The petition outlines a two-phase approach: This structured timeline mirrors the approach taken during the analog-to-digital transition. However, what's not prominently featured in the NAB's petition is that, unlike the previous transition, ATSC 3.0 includes robust content protection systems that could enable broadcasters to encrypt formerly free broadcasts—potentially transforming the business... While significant progress has been made—NextGen TV now reaches approximately 76% of American households—the full implications of this transition for consumer access remain underexplored in regulatory discussions.

Unlike the current ATSC 1.0 standard, which guarantees free access to broadcast content, ATSC 3.0 incorporates sophisticated encryption capabilities. This technical feature would enable broadcasters to require subscription fees or one-time payments for content that has historically been available at no cost beyond the purchase of a television and antenna.

People Also Search

• Coalition of conservative groups challenges NAB's push for ATSC 3.0 ...
• CTA, NCTA, LPTV Groups Meet With FCC to Oppose NAB's ATSC 3.0 Petition ...
• Group Comments on ATSC 3.0 Proposal - Public Knowledge
• Conservative Groups Take Aim at ATSC 3.0 Tuner Mandate; NAB Pushes Back
• NAB's ATSC 3.0 Petition - The Push for a Clear Transition Timeline
• 5/7 Joint Comments Opposing NAB Petition for a Mandatory Transition to ...
• Broadcast TV Is Innovating While Cable and Tech Lobbyists Are Panicking
• NAB fires back at industry coalition opposing ATSC 3.0 mandate
• Six Industry Groups Tell FCC To Reject NAB's ATSC 3.0 Transition Plan
• NAB to FCC: Shut Down ATSC 1.0 by 2028 - What It Means for You?