Did The Constitution Rest On The Principle Of Popular Sovereignty

Explore how the U.S. Constitution establishes and reinforces the principle of popular sovereignty, ensuring government derives its power from the people. The U.S. Constitution, while not explicitly using the phrase “popular sovereignty,” embeds this principle throughout its text. Popular sovereignty signifies that the authority of a state and its government originates from the consent of its people, who are the ultimate source of all political power. This concept ensures governance is by and for the people, establishing a government accountable to its citizens.

The opening words of the U.S. Constitution, “We the People of the United States,” directly establish popular sovereignty as the foundational principle of the government. This phrase signifies that the Constitution’s authority derives from the citizens themselves, not from states, monarchs, or divine right. It asserts that the power to create and sustain the government rests with the collective citizenry. This declaration underscores that the government’s legitimacy stems from the consent of the governed. The Preamble thus sets the stage for a system where the government serves the populace, rather than ruling over it.

Article I of the U.S. Constitution reflects popular sovereignty through the direct election of members of the House of Representatives. This provision ensures that the people directly choose their lawmakers, making representatives immediately accountable to their constituents. The popular election of Senators, established by the 17th Amendment, further reinforces this principle. Prior to this amendment, senators were chosen by state legislatures, but its ratification in 1913 shifted this power to the voters. These elected representatives are directly responsible to the people they serve.

Popular sovereignty is the principle that the leaders of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, who are the source of all political legitimacy. Citizens may unite and offer to delegate a portion of their sovereign powers and duties to those who wish to serve as officers of the state, contingent on the officers agreeing to serve according... In the United States, the term has been used to express this concept in constitutional law. It was also used during the 19th century in reference to a proposed solution to the debate over the expansion of slavery in the United States. The proposal would have given the power to determine the legality of slavery to the inhabitants of the territory seeking statehood, rather than to Congress. In 18th-century European political thought, "the people" excluded most of the population; suffrage was denied to women, slaves, indentured servants, those lacking sufficient property, indigenous people and the young.[1] The early American republic similarly...

According to historian Ronald Formisano, "Assertions of the peoples' sovereignty over time contained an unintended dynamic of raising popular expectations for a greater degree of popular participation and that the peoples' will be satisfied."[2][3]... Many societies had experienced government as an inheritance—as monarchies or other expressions of power.[4] The American Enlightenment marked a departure in the concept of popular sovereignty as it had been discussed and employed in the European historical context. American revolutionaries aimed to substitute the sovereignty in the person of King George III, with a collective sovereign—composed of the people. Thenceforth, American revolutionaries generally agreed with and were committed to the principle that governments were legitimate only if they rested on popular sovereignty – that is, the sovereignty of the people.[5] This was often... The concept unified and divided post-Revolutionary American thinking about government and the basis of the Union.[8] Questions were raised over its precise meaning, permissible actions and the will of a collective sovereign.

In an argument echoed by his students, for example, historian Bernard Bailyn contended that early state jurisdiction over certain colleges had been done "in the name of the People...But who were the People? A handful of legislators?...But what was the State in a republican government? Should it have powers against the people themselves?"[9] Between 1835 and 1845 the country became progressively more polarized over the issue of slavery. Debate focused on the extension of slavery: whether it would be permitted, protected, abolished, or perpetuated in the newly acquired Louisiana Purchase and Mexican Cession territories. Attempts to resolve the issue in Congress led to gridlock.

Several Congressional leaders, in an effort to resolve the deadlock over slavery as a condition for admission or administration of the territories, searched for a middle ground.[10] “We the People…” Our Constitution begins with the idea of popular sovereignty. The Founding Fathers began the U.S. Constitution with this important principle, which means that power, begins with the people. This principle is best reflected in the Preamble, Article I and in Amendment 9. Popular sovereignty is the thought that the average citizen can be trusted to make important decisions that affect his or her life and the lives of other Americans.

Throughout American history, more and more citizens were permitted to participate in the democratic process. The idea that power can begin from the ground up; that a group of people can exercise that power and change their society for the better is an exciting idea in human history. The Founders looked to their local state governments to best govern over their own local needs. At the same time they recognized the need for a strong, national government that would protect them and help regulate their commerce. The solution was the balance of federalism. Federalism is the sharing of powers between the state governments and the national government.

When the Founding Fathers wrote the U.S. Constitution, one of their challenges was creating a strong national government, which at the same time respected the rights of the state governments. How did they ensure that one did not trample onto the other? The Constitution states that the federal government has specific powers such as coining money or defending the country. At the same time, the state governments also have powers that are reserved to them, such as creating schools. Finally there are powers they share such as the power to tax.

Another principle that the Framers of the Constitution agreed upon was the idea that citizens should be able to elect their leaders. In a republic, the citizens vote for what or whom they think will be best for the general public good. To help you remember what republicanism means, take the first 3 letters of the word, R-E-P and use it to remind yourself of the word REPRESENTATIVE. Voters choose representatives to exercise the power that they give to them thru the Constitution. Republicanism is best found in the Preamble and in Article I of the Constitution. This principle of the U.S.

Constitution divides powers into three separate groups or branches of government. The reason the Framers chose this was because they wanted to ensure that no one person or group of people had too much power. Their idea originated from the way the English government had developed into three separate groups: the monarchy, the House of Lords and the House of Commons. Instead the U.S. Constitution divides power into the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judicial branch. Each branch has its own unique responsibilities and powers, including powers over the other branches.

These branches are described in Articles I, II and III. This principle of the Constitution is closely connected with Separation of Powers. The Founding Fathers wanted to make sure that the three different branches of government, the legislative, executive and judicial, would be able to limit each other’s powers. In this way they control certain powers as well as share other powers with them. For example, the President can appoint ambassadors or federal judges, but only with the approval of the Senate, the upper house of Congress. You will find the principle of Checks & Balances throughout Articles I, II, and III.

This is a very important way to protect the citizens’ liberties and ensure that no one group of people becomes too powerful. Each branch always has the other two branches looking over their shoulder. The Constitution is based on popular sovereignty. But who are the People? Two hundred and twenty six years after the ratification of the Constitution, the answer to this question is still debated. This Note jumps into the fray, closely examining the Constitution itself and the history surrounding its adoption in order to reverse-engineer a coherent theory of American popular sovereignty as it was understood at the...

Did the state peoples exist as sovereigns before the Constitution? If yes, did the Constitution consolidate them into one unitary national people? If not, is there a national people in addition to the state peoples? In short, there is a national people, but it coexists with the sovereign state peoples. Furthermore, the national people must be interpreted through a lens of state peoples—the People is national in scope and importance, but it is defined in reference to the state peoples. The reservoir of reserved powers—those uses of governmental authority that are not expressly mentioned in the text of the Constitution—defaults to the state level.

This balance of peoples means that the American system is one of limited sovereignty. Neither the federal nor the state governments can eliminate or alter the other; they reinforce each other in a structure that presupposes its perpetuity. Dual popular sovereignty is the essence of federalism, and it has broad implications for the fundamental distribution of power between the federal government and the states. Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access. Popular sovereignty is government based on the consent of the people.

The government’s source of authority is the people, and its power is not legitimate if it disregards the will of the people. Government established by the free choice of the people is expected to serve the people, who have sovereignty, or supreme power. There are four ways that popular sovereignty is expressed in a democracy. First, the people are involved either directly or through their representatives in the making of a constitution. Second, the constitution made in the name of the people is ratified by a majority vote of the people or by representatives elected by the people. Third, the people are involved directly or indirectly in proposing and ratifying amendments to their constitution.

Fourth, the people indicate support for their government when they vote in public elections, uphold the constitution and basic principles of their government, and work to influence public policy decisions and otherwise prompt their... Popular sovereignty was asserted as a founding principle of the United States of America. The Declaration of Independence of 1776 asserts that legitimate governments are those “deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed.” Later, in 1787, the framers of the U.S. Constitution proclaimed popular sovereignty in the document’s Preamble: “We the people of the United States . . .

People Also Search

• Where in the Constitution Does It Talk About Popular Sovereignty ...
• When the People Rule: The Principle of Popular Sovereignty in the U.S ...
• Popular sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia
• Popular Sovereignty—What Does "We the People" Mean?—Primary Sources
• 7 Principles within our US Constitution
• We the People: The Original Meaning of Popular Sovereignty
• PDF Principles of The Constitution: Inventing "We the Peopl
• Popular Sovereignty - Annenberg Classroom
• The Politics Shed - popular sovereignty
• Popular Sovereignty: The Ultimate Guide to "We the People"