Improving Neural Network Training Using Dynamic Learning Rate Schedule

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. This is the Official implementation and experimental results for the paper “Improving Neural Network Training Using Dynamic Learning Rate Schedule for PINNs and Image Classification”.

This repository contains code and experiments exploring dynamic learning rate scheduler to improve training stability and performance for: The work investigates DLRS adaptive scheduling strategies that respond to training dynamics, aiming to enhance convergence speed, reduce overfitting, and boost accuracy. This project is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 – see the LICENSE file for details. If you use this repository in your research, please cite: A Gentle Introduction to Learning Rate SchedulersImage by Author | ChatGPT Ever wondered why your neural network seems to get stuck during training, or why it starts strong but fails to reach its full potential?

The culprit might be your learning rate – arguably one of the most important hyperparameters in machine learning. While a fixed learning rate can work, it often leads to suboptimal results. Learning rate schedulers offer a more dynamic approach by automatically adjusting the learning rate during training. In this article, you’ll discover five popular learning rate schedulers through clear visualizations and hands-on examples. You’ll learn when to use each scheduler, see their behavior patterns, and understand how they can improve your model’s performance. We’ll start with the basics, explore sklearn’s approach versus deep learning requirements, then move to practical implementation using the MNIST dataset.

By the end, you’ll have both the theoretical understanding and practical code to start using learning rate schedulers in your own projects. Imagine you’re hiking down a mountain in thick fog, trying to reach the valley. The learning rate is like your step size – take steps too large, and you might overshoot the valley or bounce between mountainsides. Take steps too small, and you’ll move painfully slowly, possibly getting stuck on a ledge before reaching the bottom. The most direct way to accelerate convergence without sacrificing accuracy lies in tuning how the learning progression is modulated during training. Fixed step sizes often lead to plateauing or oscillations near minima.

Implementing adaptive schedules–such as cosine decay or cyclic adjustments–can reduce this issue by gradually lowering the increment scale, allowing models to settle into better solutions. For instance, a 2024 study from MIT demonstrated that switching from a constant value to a warm-up phase followed by exponential decay cut training time by 25% while improving test accuracy by nearly 3%. This approach addresses the problem of overly aggressive parameter updates during initial iterations, which often destabilize the optimization process. One question arises: why not simply pick a low initial value? The problem is twofold. Too small increments cause slow progress and unnecessary resource consumption.

Too large, and the training behaves chaotically, skipping over optimal points. Schedulers like step decay or triangular cyclical signals offer a compelling middle ground by dynamically adapting increments according to epoch milestones or batch cycles. Practical experience shows that combining warm restarts with gradual decay often outperforms static heuristics. It aligns with recent findings in adaptive gradient methods where keeping update magnitudes context-aware prevents stagnation in flat regions of loss landscapes. Additionally, careful profiling indicates that smart adjustment strategies translate into substantial energy savings–a consideration increasingly relevant for large-scale deployments. Have you reviewed how increments are controlled in your current setup?

Altering these parameters does not require rewriting architectures but a deliberate modification of training loops and hyperparameter tuning. Testing such schemes on validation sets typically reveals measurable benefits within the first few epochs, making it a pragmatic step for any iterative learning process. Neural networks are complex systems that are increasingly used in various fields. They require careful settings to perform well, especially when it comes to finding the right values for their internal settings, known as hyperparameters. One of the most crucial hyperparameters is the learning rate. This parameter determines how quickly or slowly the model updates its internal settings in response to new data.

Training a neural network involves minimizing a loss function, which measures how far off the network’s predictions are from actual outcomes. This loss function often has a complicated shape, making it challenging for the optimization methods used in training to find the best settings for the network. Traditional methods can struggle in these complex landscapes and might become stuck in less-than-ideal settings. One persistent issue is overfitting. This occurs when a model performs well on the training data but poorly on unseen data. This means the model has learned the training data too well, including its noise and outliers.

To combat this, researchers have come up with various techniques for adjusting Learning Rates and managing Loss Functions to ensure more reliable performance across different datasets. A promising approach to improve training Stability is the use of dynamic learning rates, particularly those that decay over time. Initially, a higher learning rate allows the model to make significant progress, helping it to quickly navigate the high loss values. As it gets closer to optimal settings, the learning rate decreases, enabling finer adjustments. This way, the model can settle into the best values without overshooting. When we think of a ball rolling down a hill, it starts with a strong push, rolling quickly down the slope.

As it gets closer to the valley (the best solution), the push decreases, allowing it to settle comfortably at the lowest point. This analogy illustrates how a dynamic learning rate functions during the training of a neural network. When training deep neural networks, the choice of optimization algorithm and learning rate schedule can significantly impact convergence rates. One often-overlooked technique is using dynamic learning rate schedules, which adapt the learning rate during training based on the network’s performance. In this article, we’ll explore how to implement dynamic learning rate schedules for optimal neural network performance. Why Dynamic Learning Rate Schedules?

Traditional learning rate schedules, such as step-wise or exponential decay, can lead to suboptimal convergence rates due to infrequent adjustments. Dynamic learning rate schedules address this by adjusting the learning rate on a per-batch basis, resulting in faster and more stable training. Implementing Dynamic Learning Rate Schedules We’ll use PyTorch as our framework for implementing dynamic learning rate schedules. The lr_scheduler module provides a flexible way to define custom learning rate schedules. Using a Custom Learning Rate Schedule with PyTorch To use our custom dynamic learning rate schedule, we’ll create an instance of DynamicLearningRateSchedule and pass it to the optimizer. Conclusion Dynamic learning rate schedules offer a promising approach to optimizing neural network convergence rates.

By adapting the learning rate on a per-batch basis, these schedules can result in faster and more stable training. With this article, we’ve demonstrated how to implement a custom dynamic learning rate schedule using PyTorch’s lr_scheduler module. Note that the performance of our custom learning rate schedule may vary depending on your specific use case and neural network architecture. It’s essential to experiment with different schedules and hyperparameters to find the optimal configuration for your particular problem.

People Also Search

• Improving neural network training using dynamic learning rate schedule ...
• AshwinRaikar88/dynamic-learning-rate-scheduler - GitHub
• A Gentle Introduction to Learning Rate Schedulers
• Improve Neural Network Performance Using Learning Rate Schedules | MoldStud
• Improving Neural Network Training with Dynamic Learning Rates
• Learned Learning Rate Schedules for Deep Neural Network Training Using ...
• Optimizing Neural Network Performance using Dynamic Learning Rate Schedules
• Adaptive Learning Rate Scheduling: Optimizing Training in Deep Networks ...
• Learning Rate Schedules and Optimizers, A Game Changer for Deep Neural ...