Crandi

Pdf Corresponding Authors Rules Global Science Books

Leo Migdal
-
pdf corresponding authors rules global science books

Below is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us. pdfFiller is an end-to-end solution for managing, creating, and editing documents and forms in the cloud. Save time and hassle by preparing your tax forms online. Authorship confers credit and has important academic, social, and financial implications. Authorship also implies responsibility and accountability for published work.

The following recommendations are intended to ensure that contributors who have made substantive intellectual contributions to a paper are given credit as authors, but also that contributors credited as authors understand their role in... Editors should be aware of the practice of excluding local researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) from authorship when data are from LMICs. Inclusion of local authors adds to fairness, context, and implications of the research. Lack of inclusion of local investigators as authors should prompt questioning and may lead to rejection. Because authorship does not communicate what contributions qualified an individual to be an author, some journals now request and publish information about the contributions of each person named as having participated in a submitted... Editors are strongly encouraged to develop and implement a contributorship policy.

Such policies remove much of the ambiguity surrounding contributions, but leave unresolved the question of the quantity and quality of contribution that qualify an individual for authorship. The ICMJE has thus developed criteria for authorship that can be used by all journals, including those that distinguish authors from other contributors. The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following 4 criteria: In addition to being accountable for the parts of the work done, an author should be able to identify which co-authors are responsible for specific other parts of the work. In addition, authors should have confidence in the integrity of the contributions of their co-authors. Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. It is generally understood that the corresponding author (CA) is responsible for all communications related to the submission of a manuscript to a journal. However, it is quite common that the CA be a student or inexperienced scientist, which can lead to often very damaging results arising from the allocation of responsibility to that person. Errors most commonly made by these CAs (despite signed declarations to the publisher or journal) include: submission of a manuscript without knowledge of the co-authors; falsification of data or double submissions; and inclusion of... Most of these errors could be eliminated if: 1) There were full, open and transparent communication between the CA and the other co-authors and between the CA and the publisher; 2) The CA selected... The choice of the CA should not lie with the journal or publisher, but the choice should be made smartly in line with guidelines such as those presented in this paper.

While research paper writing is turning into a prolific enterprise even in our country, there has never been any stock taking on the nature or number of errors committed by prospective authors. This paper uses a retrospective analysis of available reviewer reports to catalogue common errors identified during refereeing of 50 pre-publication manuscripts in the form of original research papers submitted to 7 indexed journals. With the available reviewers' reports, a comprehensive listing of the common errors was carried under each section of a typical research paper. Results indicate 167 types of errors (Mean: 3.34) equaling 1476 number of errors (Mean: 29.5). The greatest types of errors in the reviewed manuscripts were under the section on method (21/167: 12.6 %), followed by those under data analysis (17/167: 10.2%), improper use of grammar-semantics-syntax (15/167: 9.0 %), and... Contrast this with most number of errors under data analysis (184/1476: 12.5 %), method (179/ 1476: 12.1 %), references (156/1476: 10.6 %) and others.

In relation to the disciplines reviewed, highest types and number of errors were found in journals of special education, followed by those in speech-hearing and least in journals of psychology. A content wise comprehensive catalogue of common errors is presented with illustrative examples before the implication of these findings and they are discussed in the context and need for carrying out periodic academic authorship... We conducted this scoping review of common errors identified by editors and reviewers of biomedical manuscripts. Errors includes items that a reviewer or editor might identify as needing correction. The errors were categorized by section of the manuscript: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References. After screening 87 published studies, 16 papers were selected for data extraction.

Of these 16 studies, the most frequently represented disciplines were Medicine (n = 5), Radiology (n = 2), and Psychiatry (n = 2). The most reported common errors included inappropriate study design, inadequate sample size, poor statistical analysis, and unclear and inadequate description of methods. Abstracts not reflecting the content of the paper were the most frequent general common error in biomedical manuscripts. The findings of this study offer one perspective on common errors in biomedical manuscripts and might be a useful guide for novice authors. These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere. Authorship clarified Springer Nature assumes that all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the...

The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. It is recommended that authors adhere to the guidelines for authorship that are applicable in their specific research field. In absence of specific guidelines it is recommended to adhere to the following guidelines a,b: All authors whose names appear on the submission Springer and Discover journals encourage collaboration with colleagues in the locations where the research is conducted, and expect their inclusion as co-authors when they fulfill all authorship criteria described above. Contributors who do not meet all criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgements section.

People Also Search

Below Is A List Of The Most Common Customer Questions.

Below is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us. pdfFiller is an end-to-end solution for managing, creating, and editing documents and forms in the cloud. Save time and hassle by preparing your tax forms online. Authorship confers credit and has important academic, social, and financial implications. Auth...

The Following Recommendations Are Intended To Ensure That Contributors Who

The following recommendations are intended to ensure that contributors who have made substantive intellectual contributions to a paper are given credit as authors, but also that contributors credited as authors understand their role in... Editors should be aware of the practice of excluding local researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) from authorship when data are from LMI...

Such Policies Remove Much Of The Ambiguity Surrounding Contributions, But

Such policies remove much of the ambiguity surrounding contributions, but leave unresolved the question of the quantity and quality of contribution that qualify an individual for authorship. The ICMJE has thus developed criteria for authorship that can be used by all journals, including those that distinguish authors from other contributors. The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the fol...

To Browse Academia.edu And The Wider Internet Faster And More

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. It is generally understood that the corresponding author (CA) is responsible for all communications related to the submission of a manuscript to a journal. However, it is quite common that the CA be a student or inexperienced scientist, which can lead to often very damaging re...

While Research Paper Writing Is Turning Into A Prolific Enterprise

While research paper writing is turning into a prolific enterprise even in our country, there has never been any stock taking on the nature or number of errors committed by prospective authors. This paper uses a retrospective analysis of available reviewer reports to catalogue common errors identified during refereeing of 50 pre-publication manuscripts in the form of original research papers submi...