Crandi

Ref 2021 Education Times Higher Education The

Leo Migdal
-
ref 2021 education times higher education the

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars The Research Excellence Framework has been postponed for three months ‘to take stock and ensure alignment with the UK government’s priorities and vision for higher education’. But how radical should the changes be? Should there be any at all? Is it time to start again? We present five very different views

Breaking the link between researchers and their outputs harms academic mobility and disciplinary excellence, argue professors Three-month review of Research Excellence Framework could trigger more radical rethink on institutional priorities and spending, sector figures warn Although major players still dominate on research power, some large – and small – regional institutions have made their mark Greater weighting helps medical institutions in particular improve overall positions Main panel C records biggest increase in number of submissions and participating staff The latest iteration of the UK’s national research audit has fulfilled its aim to identify research quality across the whole system, says David Sweeney

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars Although major players still dominate on research power, some large – and small – regional institutions have made their mark Four in five outputs judged to be either ‘world-leading’ or ‘internationally excellent’ Greater weighting helps medical institutions in particular improve overall positions Main panel C records biggest increase in number of submissions and participating staff While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars The Research Excellence Framework has been postponed for three months ‘to take stock and ensure alignment with the UK government’s priorities and vision for higher education’. But how radical should the changes be? Should there be any at all? Is it time to start again? We present five very different views

Breaking the link between researchers and their outputs harms academic mobility and disciplinary excellence, argue professors Three-month review of Research Excellence Framework could trigger more radical rethink on institutional priorities and spending, sector figures warn Both universities could gain credit when an academic moves, under plans Universities, and especially the research elite, faced a choice between aiming for highest quality scores and the greatest number of staff submitted The director of a partnership of research-intensive universities is upbeat about future outlook LSE pro-director also calls for metrics to measure impact

Funding gains for smaller universities ‘risks UK research quality’ The center at the university’s public health school was also a focus of the Trump administration after having been examined in a Harvard antisemitism report earlier this year. When teachers do assign whole books, they often choose from a stagnant list of classics. Some disciplinary measures have been imposed on the lecturer, including being monitored as she teaches a class on diversity and social justice. The school has been brought to heel by conservative critics of higher education. It is part of a broader transformation at the state’s universities.

The claims last year by a conservative publication against Darryll J. Pines prompted a yearlong investigation and an extensive review of his published works. The REF 2021 results for both education and sport-related research place us as Scotland’s top-ranked institution for research breadth and quality (Times Higher Education). We are now ranked 3rd in the UK in terms of the breadth and quality of our research in education, with nearly 80 per cent classified as ‘world leading’ and ‘internationally excellent’ (Times Higher... Nearly 90 per cent of our sport-related research activity is classified as ‘world leading’ and ‘internationally excellent’, a growth of 22 per cent since the previous REF in 2014. This article was published on 2024-10-07

The University of Leicester has made one of the biggest climbs of any UK university in the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021, published on Thursday. With a ranking of 30th (Times Higher Education analysis of REF 2021 results), up 23 places from the previous REF in 2014, the University’s result represents its best-ever performance in a national research assessment... †REF rankings are compiled by the Times Higher Education (THE) following analysis of data from Research England. 751 individual Leicester research staff took part in the REF submission, across 22 assessment areas. The REF 2021 covers the period 2014 to 2020 and, for the first time, included an assessment of all research output from each UK institution. More than a quarter of Leicester’s 22 units of assessment are among the UK’s top five by overall score.

A total of 157 UK universities were assessed on quality of their research outputs, impact case studies detailing the real-world benefits which their research delivered, and evidence of how the research environment has supported...

People Also Search

While New Technologies Seen As ‘game Changer’ For National-level Research

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars The Research Excellence Framework has been postponed for three months ‘to take stock and ensure alignment with the UK government’s priorities and vision for higher education’. But how radical should the changes be? Should there be any at all?...

Breaking The Link Between Researchers And Their Outputs Harms Academic

Breaking the link between researchers and their outputs harms academic mobility and disciplinary excellence, argue professors Three-month review of Research Excellence Framework could trigger more radical rethink on institutional priorities and spending, sector figures warn Although major players still dominate on research power, some large – and small – regional institutions have made their mark ...

While New Technologies Seen As ‘game Changer’ For National-level Research

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars Although major players still dominate on research power, some large – and small – regional institutions have made their mark Four in five outputs judged to be either ‘world-leading’ or ‘internationally excellent’ Greater weighting helps medic...

While New Technologies Seen As ‘game Changer’ For National-level Research

While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars The Research Excellence Framework has been postponed for three months ‘to take stock and ensure alignment with the UK government’s priorities and vision for higher education’. But how radical should the changes be? Should there be any at all?...

Breaking The Link Between Researchers And Their Outputs Harms Academic

Breaking the link between researchers and their outputs harms academic mobility and disciplinary excellence, argue professors Three-month review of Research Excellence Framework could trigger more radical rethink on institutional priorities and spending, sector figures warn Both universities could gain credit when an academic moves, under plans Universities, and especially the research elite, face...