Research Excellence Framework Ref 2021 Results For University Of Oxfor

The UK Funding Bodies have published the outcomes of the recent national research assessment exercise, the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021. The REF 2021 results show Oxford’s submission had the highest volume of world-leading research. [1] The University of Oxford made the largest submission of any Higher Education Institution (HEI) in the UK, submitting over 3,600 researchers (3,405 full time equivalent) into 29 subject areas, over 8,500 research outputs in... Professor Louise Richardson, Vice-Chancellor at the University of Oxford, said: ‘The REF 2021 results demonstrate once again that Oxford is a research powerhouse.

The impact case studies highlight our effectiveness in putting this research in service to society by making critical contributions to global health, economic prosperity and cultural life.’ Welcome to our guide to University of Oxford Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 results for PhD study. Select a subject area below to see how good this university is at producing high quality research in the topics you might want to study for your PhD. The REF works by asking universities to submit information about their research and asking other expert academics to judge how good it is (a system called ‘peer-review’). Universities are reviewed on three things: The definitions of individual ranking levels vary slightly between different assessment criteria, but the overall REF result is designed to place University of Oxford research in a global academic context.

It establishes the proportion of its work that is deemed to be: Although major players still dominate on research power, some large – and small – regional institutions have made their mark Greater weighting helps medical institutions in particular improve overall positions Main panel C records biggest increase in number of submissions and participating staff The latest iteration of the UK’s national research audit has fulfilled its aim to identify research quality across the whole system, says David Sweeney While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars

The University of Oxford’s results in REF 2021 are given below. Results are shown as the percentage of the submission achieving the following starred levels: 4* – quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour3* – quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour, but which falls short if the highest standards... Unclassified (U/C) – Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work, or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment. The overall results for the University as a whole are given as an FTE-weighted average of the subject results. The table then shows the results for each subject area submission.

We also show the total number of full time equivalent (FTE) staff submitted for each subject. REF 2021 results by unit of assessment (UOA) ResearchPlus, a national collaboration of research-focused universities that includes Essex, has welcomed the news that planned reforms to REF 2029 have been reversed. After pausing activities as reforms were reviewed, Research Excellence Framework panels, which include Essex researchers, will now begin setting the criteria and finalising the guidance so the national assessment of research quality can resume. Under the proposed reforms, which caused REF 2029 to pause for three months, researchers would have been allowed to submit an unlimited number of research outputs. Academics will now be limited to submitting a maximum of five outputs and the weighting attached to “people, culture and environment”, now renamed “strategy, people and research environment”, has been downgraded from a proposed...

The changes bring REF rules and policies closer to those that guided the 2021 exercise. The REF 2021 results show Oxford’s submission had the highest volume of world-leading research.* The University of Oxford made the largest submission of any Higher Education Institution (HEI) in the UK, submitting over 3,600 researchers (3,405 full time equivalent) into 29 subject areas, over 8,500 research outputs in... Professor Louise Richardson, Vice-Chancellor at the University of Oxford, said: ‘The REF 2021 results demonstrate once again that Oxford is a research powerhouse. The impact case studies highlight our effectiveness in putting this research in service to society by making critical contributions to global health, economic prosperity and cultural life.’

‘The REF is one of the few opportunities to see the remarkable breadth of our research and to draw together all parts of the collegiate University in a single collaborative effort, I would like... The Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2029 is vital to supporting a UK research system that delivers knowledge and innovation with real-world impact. A key mechanism underpinning the allocation of around £2 billion annually in research funding, REF ensures accountability for public investment and provides critical insight into the health and impact of UK research. Today’s updates follow the pause announced by UK Science Minister Lord Vallance in September and have been shaped through extensive engagement with the sector and the expert REF panel members. With these updates, the REF panels, who represent the sector and bring diverse expertise, will begin setting the criteria and finalising the guidance for REF 2029. REF 2029 introduces Strategy, People and Research Environment (SPRE), weighted at 20%, which will replace the previously named ‘People, Culture and Environment (PCE)’ element.

It builds on the REF 2021 Environment component and is informed by the People, Culture and Environment Pilot, the report of which is being published today. Weightings for the other elements are refined to 55% for Contributions to Knowledge and Understanding (CKU) and 25% for Engagement and Impact (E&I). The funding bodies have refined these weightings having listened to the sector and considered the results of the PCE Pilot. These amended weightings demonstrate a strong commitment from the funding bodies, shared by the sector, to growing open, collaborative and resilient research environments that support people to produce excellent research whilst also recognising that... To reduce burden, CKU has been simplified and clarified; the assessment of impact has been broadly retained from REF 2021 and unit-level statements have been removed from both these elements. The recommended maximum of five outputs per researcher is reinstated for clarity but to avoid pressure on individuals, the minimum of one has been removed.

The pragmatic response to misunderstandings around the word ‘culture’ will ensure that grassroots momentum is not lost, says John-Arne Røttingen While new technologies seen as ‘game changer’ for national-level research assessment, study finds vehement opposition, particularly among humanities scholars Controversial rules on uncapping output numbers for researchers and preventing research ‘portability’ confirmed Universities ‘relieved’ by balance of qualitative and quantitative data in environment evaluations Decision to row back reforms demonstrates difficulties of using process to engineer social change, critics say, with little clarity over how newly revised ‘people’ section will work

People Also Search

• University of Oxford REF 2021 | University of Oxford
• Results and submissions : REF 2021
• Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 Results for University of Oxford
• REF 2021: research excellence framework results | Times Higher ...
• REF 2021 results - University of Oxford
• ResearchPlus welcomes changes as REF 2029 resumes - University of Essex
• University of Oxford's REF results | Research Support
• Announcement of Changes to Research Excellence Framework 2029 - UCL
• REF 2029 publishes updates and resumes criteria setting following pause
• REF 2029 downgrades research culture, restores five output limit