Resources To Support Responsible Authorship Practices
Authorship conveys credit and responsibility for published work. There are a variety of guidelines that inform how authorship is assigned. Information linked or provided here is intended to connect research teams to recognized guidelines, support discussion of discipline-specific norms, and encourage documentation of written agreements related to authorship of planned publications and presentations. A shared understanding of how contributions will be recognized can prevent disputes at the time of publication. Ideally, when disagreements do arise about authorship, they are resolved through informal communication between co-authors and collaborators. If the matter remains unresolved, contributors should discuss the issue with their department head or unit lead.
Consultation with the Research Integrity Officer can be requested at any point. Defining the role of authors and contributors. ICMJE’s authorship criteria are widely accepted by journals across disciplines. Contribution Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) Includes 14 roles typically that can be used to describe each contributor’s specific contribution to the scholarly output. NIH OIR General Guidelines for Authorship Contributions One responsibility of TTU faculty is to assign authorship to manuscripts and other works of scholarship and creative expression.
Authorship identifies individuals who contribute to and are accountable for a work. Authorship credit plays an important role in the growth of an individual’s academic reputation and promotion. Discussions about criteria and responsibilities of authorship, begun early and continued throughout a project, can allow collaborators to identify and understand discipline- and journal-specific requirements for authorship, Discussions about authorship criteria allow collaborators to... Engaging students in authorship discussions can resolve authorship of a particular work and educate about scholarly and professional responsibilities. Resources to support discussions about authorship and resolve disputes are provided below. The TTU Graduate School has established acknowledgement of student contributions in published material as a responsibility of faculty who serve as Major Professors [The Role of Academic Advisors, Major Professors, and Committees]
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) resources about authorship include two minimum requirements for authorship [Authorship | COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics] Guidance for authorship contributions developed by the NIH Office of Intramural Research identifies complexities that can arise over the course of a project [see https://bit.ly/314njwK] The criteria for authorship developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) include four criteria for authorship and recommendations for meeting the criteria and acknowledging contributions of individuals who do not meet... Please contact me if you have questions about authorship or publication practices. Julie Simpson Director, Research Integrity Services Service Building, Room 107 Durham, NH 03824 (603) 862-2003 julie.simpson@unh.edu Publication is the primary means by which scholarly work is made available to other scholars, industry, medical practitioners, policymakers, and the general public (sometimes via intermediaries such as science journalists).
Via the resources provided here, learn more about the ethical issues that authors and reviewers face, and how to address them in your own research or scholarship. Think. Check. Submit. from Think. Check.
Submit. on Vimeo. That’s why we’re working to cultivate an ethical culture of authorship in higher education. Whether you’re a student, faculty member, or just curious to learn more, we have resources to help. Authorship provides credit for an individual’s contributions to a study and carries accountability. There are no universally accepted standards for assigning authorship, and principles, customs and practices differ significantly from one discipline to another.
Responsibility for decisions regarding the authorship of publications lies with those who carried out the work reported in the publication. Researchers should be aware of the authorship practices within their own disciplines and should always abide by any requirements stipulated by journals as part of their instructions to authors. Where no journal or discipline-specific norms apply, authorship criteria should be agreed by all investigators at an early stage of the research. Where possible, it is advisable to keep written records of decisions regarding authorship and these should be revisited where roles and contributions change over the lifecycle of the study. Normally, an author is an individual judged to have made a substantial intellectual or practical contribution to a publication and who agrees to be accountable for that contribution. This would normally include anyone who has:
made a significant contribution to the conception or design of the project or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND/OR Authorship is often called the “currency” of academia because of the significant role it plays in employment prospects, promotion and tenure decisions, and grant awards. Determination of authorship depends on academic disciplines and can be unclear or a challenge to discuss at times due to power dynamics between students and faculty; gender differences; and the evolving nature of projects... Because the stakes are high and authorship practices vary, authorship decision making can provoke discomfort or conflict, even among healthy collaborative relationships. For these reasons, the Graduate School has led an effort to provide clarity to students and faculty about good authorship practices and ways to address disagreements. Our first step was to support the adoption of an institutional authorship policy, University Policy #318, “Authorship Policy and Resolution Procedures”.
We have also collected resources on authorship, and created an authorship agreement form and app. You can find more information about each area on this site. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte adopted Policy #318, “Authorship Policy and Resolution Procedures,” in 2021. The policy’s purpose is to provide general authorship guidelines, suggest healthy authorship practices, and provide both informal and formal steps for dispute resolution. For more on the policy, visit University Policy #318. University of Arizona Authorship Guidelines
Authorship confers credit and has singificant implications for researchers. The University of Arizona is committed to ensuring fair recognition of contributions in research and scholarly publications and to providing guidelines that foster a culture of transparency, collaboration, and collegiality. Below we address what authorship means and why it matters, what authorship resources are available, and how to handle disputes in authorship. Jump to specific sections using the links below: What is Authorship and why does it matter? Authorship is a critical component of research, reflecting the contributions of individuals to a body of work.
It signifies not only the creation of ideas but also the collaborative effort required to bring those ideas to fruition, whether through developing theories, conducting experiments, or writing scholarly articles. Authorship matters because it is the primary means by which researchers receive recognition and credit for their work. This recognition is essential for professional advancement, promotions, funding opportunities, and reputational standing—of both the author and institution—within the academic community.
People Also Search
- Resources to Support Responsible Authorship Practices
- Responsible Authorship Quick Guide | ORI - The Office of Research Integrity
- PDF Good Authorship Practice - ukrio.org
- Authorship | RCR | Office of Responsible Research | Research Home | TTU
- Guidelines on Authorship in Scholarly or Scientific Publications
- Authorship & Publication - Responsible Conduct of Research & Scholarly ...
- the authorship project
- Authorship guidance - University of Cambridge
- Authorship - The Graduate School
- Authorship Guidelines and Dispute Resolution Process
Authorship Conveys Credit And Responsibility For Published Work. There Are
Authorship conveys credit and responsibility for published work. There are a variety of guidelines that inform how authorship is assigned. Information linked or provided here is intended to connect research teams to recognized guidelines, support discussion of discipline-specific norms, and encourage documentation of written agreements related to authorship of planned publications and presentation...
Consultation With The Research Integrity Officer Can Be Requested At
Consultation with the Research Integrity Officer can be requested at any point. Defining the role of authors and contributors. ICMJE’s authorship criteria are widely accepted by journals across disciplines. Contribution Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) Includes 14 roles typically that can be used to describe each contributor’s specific contribution to the scholarly output. NIH OIR General Guidelines for Au...
Authorship Identifies Individuals Who Contribute To And Are Accountable For
Authorship identifies individuals who contribute to and are accountable for a work. Authorship credit plays an important role in the growth of an individual’s academic reputation and promotion. Discussions about criteria and responsibilities of authorship, begun early and continued throughout a project, can allow collaborators to identify and understand discipline- and journal-specific requirement...
COPE (Committee On Publication Ethics) Resources About Authorship Include Two
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) resources about authorship include two minimum requirements for authorship [Authorship | COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics] Guidance for authorship contributions developed by the NIH Office of Intramural Research identifies complexities that can arise over the course of a project [see https://bit.ly/314njwK] The criteria for authorship developed by the In...
Via The Resources Provided Here, Learn More About The Ethical
Via the resources provided here, learn more about the ethical issues that authors and reviewers face, and how to address them in your own research or scholarship. Think. Check. Submit. from Think. Check.