Crandi

Un S Pact For The Future Ignites Debate On Global Governance And

Leo Migdal
-
un s pact for the future ignites debate on global governance and

NEW YORK, 22 September — World leaders today adopted a Pact for the Future that includes a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations. This Pact is the culmination of an inclusive, years-long process to adapt international cooperation to the realities of today and the challenges of tomorrow. The most wide-ranging international agreement in many years, covering entirely new areas as well as issues on which agreement has not been possible in decades, the Pact aims above all to ensure that international... As the Secretary-General has said: “We cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents.” Overall, the agreement of the Pact is a strong statement of countries’ commitment to the United Nations, the international system and international law. Leaders set out a clear vision of an international system that can deliver on its promises, is more representative of today’s world, and draws on the energy and expertise of governments, civil society and...

“The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” said the Secretary-General during his remarks at the opening of... The President of the General Assembly noted that the Pact would “lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order – for all peoples and nations.” The Pact covers a broad range of issues including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations, and the transformation of global governance. Key deliverables in the Pact include: On sustainable development, climate and financing for development The adoption of the “Pact for the Future” by the United Nations on September 22, 2024, marks a pivotal moment in global governance, yet it has largely flown under the radar of mainstream media.

This oversight begs the question: why are we not paying closer attention to a document that lays the groundwork for a new global order? While the public fixates on political drama involving figures like Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, the elite have stealthily orchestrated a shift in international policy that could redefine human activity across multiple sectors. The “Pact for the Future” is not merely a bureaucratic formality; it is a sweeping agreement that encompasses peace and security, sustainable development, digital cooperation, and climate change, among other critical issues. The UN Secretary-General’s assertion that we cannot build a future for our grandchildren with a system designed by our grandparents resonates deeply. However, the implications of this pact are profound and potentially troubling. The document is replete with provisions that aim to turbocharge the implementation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, but at what cost?

The UN’s vision for a “modern UN family” under the banner of “UN 2.0” sounds appealing on the surface, but it masks a more insidious agenda. The language used by the UN is designed to evoke a sense of community and cooperation, yet it is clear that the real intention is to impose a uniform set of regulations and standards... The idea of a global minimum tax on high-net-worth individuals is particularly alarming, as it opens the door for unprecedented international taxation mechanisms that could undermine national sovereignty. Moreover, the pact’s commitment to addressing climate change through strict regulations on human activities raises serious concerns. The assertion that all forms of human activity contribute to climate change suggests a future where personal freedoms may be curtailed under the guise of environmental protection. This could lead to a scenario where the UN, backed by a coalition of nations, dictates how individuals and businesses operate, potentially stifling innovation and economic growth.

The “Pact for the Future” also emphasizes a coordinated international response to “global shocks,” which raises the question of who will truly benefit from such oversight. In times of crisis, do we want an organization like the UN, which has often been criticized for inefficiency and overreach, dictating the terms of recovery? The notion of a “multidimensional international response” could easily devolve into a one-size-fits-all approach that disregards the unique needs of individual nations. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The autumn of 2024 may prove to become historical due to a powerful event – the Summit of the Future, one of the most important high-level meetings of the United Nations. World leaders considered not only what the future of the planet will look like in the context of multiple conflicts, climate change, food insecurity, the refugee crisis, but also the rapid advances in new...

Although the summit may appear to have been similar to many others held recently, it proved to be momentous from the very first day when the parties negotiated and adopted the Pact of the... We asked development experts to share some thoughts on the importance of this document. Check their opinions below. DevelopmentAid: How does the Pact for the Future’s approach to global governance differ from previous international agreements? Why is it important and what mechanisms will ensure its implementation? “After a decade of implementing the 2030 Agenda and achieving only 17% progress to achieve the 169 targets in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, we should review the conviction that it is a market...

The reality is more complex: we now face more wars, poverty has risen, with 20% of the world’s population enduring acute hardship, and we must adapt to increasing floods, droughts, and extreme temperatures. These challenges underscore the urgent need for an innovative approach. Imagine if we tried to unify the Ten Judeo-Christian Commandments, Islamic principles, and Buddhist teachings into a single set of rules. Would that succeed? This highlights the difficulty of imposing universal solutions on diverse and often conflicting perspectives. I am particularly inspired by young people worldwide who have taken the initiative to lead change.

They know that if they do not act now, there could be a massive impact on their future. As 52% of the global population is under 30, their movements, like Fridays for Future and others that reinvent democracy like the Influencers, are not just a signal, but a beacon of hope for... We must reconsider how we engage at local, regional, and global levels, placing greater emphasis on integral education, civic training, and community empowerment. It’s not enough to rebrand Agenda 2030 as Agenda 2045 or the Agenda of the Future; we need a new paradigm that promotes a more harmonious existence with the earth and all its inhabitants. To move forward, we must rethink the system and approach it with more intelligence than merely repeating past efforts. This requires us all to listen more deeply — to the environment, each other, and the diverse voices that can guide us toward a sustainable future.”

“The Pact, as an acknowledgement of existential threats to the world, approaches the various facets of global governance holistically, reaffirming that the already existing commitments (resolutions and amendments) are the cornerstone of subsequent reform... By joining the Pact, individual countries confirm they are committed to the UN goals and are ready to reinvigorate international law and multilateralism to get the world back on track and to seize opportunities... It is noteworthy that the largest proportion of the actions set out in the Pact is devoted to transforming global governance and accelerating the reform of the international financial architecture. Other actions are distributed among four areas with international peace and security being the highest priority followed by actions to revamp the achievement of the SDGs. With international peace and security at stake now more than ever, the UN pledges to implement the long-discussed and urgent reform of the Security Council, targeting its effectiveness and representation, that is the scope... A revitalization of the General Assembly, stronger coordination between the UN and international financial institutions, the existing governance mechanisms independent of the UN, effective international debt relief mechanisms, and international tax cooperation are some...

(Editor’s note: Author Richard Ponzio also discusses the U.N. General Assembly’s Summit of the Future and high-level week in the Just Security Podcast. Listen here or wherever you get your podcasts.) More than 130 heads of state and government met at United Nations Headquarters in New York last week amid an expanding war in the Middle East, continued devastating conflicts in Africa and Europe, and... So perhaps it is all the more remarkable that they mustered agreement on key documents that may re-establish a path toward enhanced global cooperation through the United Nations and beyond. Meeting in the Sept.

22-23 Summit of the Future, and pressed by the energetic advocacy of more than 10,000 civil society representatives in the preceding “Action Days,” the global leaders produced a Pact for the Future, a Global... The hard-fought agreements, though imperfect, should serve as stepping stones for even more ambitious, high-impact improvements down the road in an array of global governance institutions, including in the financial and economic realm, with... Albeit Down to the Wire, the Pact Landed Safely A growing chorus of diplomats had called for “landing the Pact” back in mid-July, when the Namibian and German co-facilitators presented Revision 2. But it took two more months and four more revisions before the agreement and its two annexes (the aforementioned Compact and Declaration) would reach adoption. Some of the most contentious issues in the concluding weeks were in the areas of climate action, disarmament, international financial architecture reform, and human rights.

Countries including Pakistan and Cuba (leading the self-declared “Like-Minded Group”), as well as Russia at times, viewed the Summit of the Future as a distraction at best and, moreover, infringing on their sovereignty and... They worked to thwart the negotiations and erode key actions and associated commitments, including on human rights and climate. The Pact along with its annexes, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations, was adopted by consensus, despite a last-minute proposal for an amendment by some countries, including Russia, Iran, the... The amendment sought to incorporate text calling for non-intervention in any issue of national sovereignty, and the primacy of intergovernmental deliberation, in effect, downplaying the role of the civil society or private sector interests. It was rejected after the 193-member Assembly decided not to act on the proposal. Click here for UN News’ live coverage of the meeting and here to download the resolution

The Pact’s five broad focus areas include: sustainable development; international peace and security; science and technology; youth and future generations and transforming global governance. This has become an urgent pivot, as multilateral financial institutions and even the United Nations itself have come up short seeking solutions to 21st century problems, the pact lays out.

People Also Search

NEW YORK, 22 September — World Leaders Today Adopted A

NEW YORK, 22 September — World leaders today adopted a Pact for the Future that includes a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations. This Pact is the culmination of an inclusive, years-long process to adapt international cooperation to the realities of today and the challenges of tomorrow. The most wide-ranging international agreement in many years, covering entirely new area...

“The Pact For The Future, The Global Digital Compact, And

“The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” said the Secretary-General during his remarks at the opening of... The President of the General Assembly noted that the Pact would “lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order – for all peoples and nations.” The P...

This Oversight Begs The Question: Why Are We Not Paying

This oversight begs the question: why are we not paying closer attention to a document that lays the groundwork for a new global order? While the public fixates on political drama involving figures like Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, the elite have stealthily orchestrated a shift in international policy that could redefine human activity across multiple sectors. The “Pact for the Future” is not m...

The UN’s Vision For A “modern UN Family” Under The

The UN’s vision for a “modern UN family” under the banner of “UN 2.0” sounds appealing on the surface, but it masks a more insidious agenda. The language used by the UN is designed to evoke a sense of community and cooperation, yet it is clear that the real intention is to impose a uniform set of regulations and standards... The idea of a global minimum tax on high-net-worth individuals is particu...

The “Pact For The Future” Also Emphasizes A Coordinated International

The “Pact for the Future” also emphasizes a coordinated international response to “global shocks,” which raises the question of who will truly benefit from such oversight. In times of crisis, do we want an organization like the UN, which has often been criticized for inefficiency and overreach, dictating the terms of recovery? The notion of a “multidimensional international response” could easily ...