Crandi

Pdf Defining The Role Of Authors And Contributors

Leo Migdal
-
pdf defining the role of authors and contributors

Authorship confers credit and has important academic, social, and financial implications. Authorship also implies responsibility and accountability for published work. The following recommendations are intended to ensure that contributors who have made substantive intellectual contributions to a paper are given credit as authors, but also that contributors credited as authors understand their role in... Editors should be aware of the practice of excluding local researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) from authorship when data are from LMICs. Inclusion of local authors adds to fairness, context, and implications of the research. Lack of inclusion of local investigators as authors should prompt questioning and may lead to rejection.

Because authorship does not communicate what contributions qualified an individual to be an author, some journals now request and publish information about the contributions of each person named as having participated in a submitted... Editors are strongly encouraged to develop and implement a contributorship policy. Such policies remove much of the ambiguity surrounding contributions, but leave unresolved the question of the quantity and quality of contribution that qualify an individual for authorship. The ICMJE has thus developed criteria for authorship that can be used by all journals, including those that distinguish authors from other contributors. The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following 4 criteria: In addition to being accountable for the parts of the work done, an author should be able to identify which co-authors are responsible for specific other parts of the work.

In addition, authors should have confidence in the integrity of the contributions of their co-authors. Determining who qualifies as an author on a scholarly work—and in what order—can be one of the most complex and consequential aspects of academic publishing. Questions of authorship touch on professional ethics, disciplinary norms, collaboration dynamics, and institutional expectations. As research becomes increasingly interdisciplinary and collaborative, the need for clarity around authorship roles, responsibilities, and agreements has never been greater. This guide, developed in collaboration with Dr. Alice Young and Dr.

Casside Street, brings together a wide range of resources to support researchers, students, and faculty in navigating the multifaceted landscape of academic authorship. Topics include definitions of authorship, contributor roles and taxonomies, authorship agreements, common sources of dispute, and how to address misconduct. Whether you are preparing your first manuscript, mentoring students, or managing collaborative research teams, this guide is designed to help you foster transparency, accountability, and fairness in your publishing practices. I am writing because I need clarification on contributor roles, as I couldn’t find satisfactory answers in the existing documentation. I would like to know the specific definitions for each of the following “contributor” roles. Is there a specific page or guideline that details these functions?:

For example, when crediting the peer reviewers who conducted the peer review and who are also editors of the journal, which role should I use? Furthermore, in a scientific article with a group of authors who all made an equivalent contribution, should all of them be designated as “first-author”? Or, after listing the “first-author,” should everyone else be listed as “additional-author” regardless of their collaboration? How should I distinguish between them? Also, if a group of authors each performed a specific function, how do I distribute the “first-author” and “additional-author” roles?

People Also Search

Authorship Confers Credit And Has Important Academic, Social, And Financial

Authorship confers credit and has important academic, social, and financial implications. Authorship also implies responsibility and accountability for published work. The following recommendations are intended to ensure that contributors who have made substantive intellectual contributions to a paper are given credit as authors, but also that contributors credited as authors understand their role...

Because Authorship Does Not Communicate What Contributions Qualified An Individual

Because authorship does not communicate what contributions qualified an individual to be an author, some journals now request and publish information about the contributions of each person named as having participated in a submitted... Editors are strongly encouraged to develop and implement a contributorship policy. Such policies remove much of the ambiguity surrounding contributions, but leave u...

In Addition, Authors Should Have Confidence In The Integrity Of

In addition, authors should have confidence in the integrity of the contributions of their co-authors. Determining who qualifies as an author on a scholarly work—and in what order—can be one of the most complex and consequential aspects of academic publishing. Questions of authorship touch on professional ethics, disciplinary norms, collaboration dynamics, and institutional expectations. As resear...

Casside Street, Brings Together A Wide Range Of Resources To

Casside Street, brings together a wide range of resources to support researchers, students, and faculty in navigating the multifaceted landscape of academic authorship. Topics include definitions of authorship, contributor roles and taxonomies, authorship agreements, common sources of dispute, and how to address misconduct. Whether you are preparing your first manuscript, mentoring students, or ma...

For Example, When Crediting The Peer Reviewers Who Conducted The

For example, when crediting the peer reviewers who conducted the peer review and who are also editors of the journal, which role should I use? Furthermore, in a scientific article with a group of authors who all made an equivalent contribution, should all of them be designated as “first-author”? Or, after listing the “first-author,” should everyone else be listed as “additional-author” regardless ...