Crandi

Submissions Data Ref 2021

Leo Migdal
-
submissions data ref 2021

The REF website uses cookies to make the site more efficient. Find out more about cookies and how we use them. document.write('<span class="close" title="Close">x<\/span>'); The charts below show the number of submissions made and the numbers of staff, outputs and impact case studies included in submissions. These data are available for all panels and by main panel. Where relevant, the numbers submitted to REF 2014 are also shown.

In line with the new requirement for HEIs to return all staff with significant responsibility for research in REF 2021, the total number of full-time equivalent (FTE) staff returned has increased by 46 per... The REF 2021 Data Explorer is an interactive web platform developed to support transparent and insightful analysis of the UK’s 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF) results. The REF is a national assessment of research quality across all UK universities, covering outputs, impact case studies, research income, and environment indicators across 34 subject-based units of assessment. All underlying data is openly sourced from the official REF 2021 release and has been systematically processed to support robust analysis and visualisation. Processing steps included standardising formats, interpreting codes, fixing alignment issues, aggregating variables, and enhancing the structure for usability. The Python codebase used for processing is openly available, along with detailed logs for each dataset.

The site allows users to filter and compare across institutions and units of assessment, and to explore key indicators such as research outputs, doctoral degrees awarded, research income (including in-kind), and both institutional and... It provides a user-friendly interface for researchers, analysts, and policymakers to engage meaningfully with the data that informs UK research funding and strategy. Open source code: https://github.com/Hidden-REF/REF-2021-data-explorer Copyright Accessibility Statement Privacy Statement Edit Website An enhanced version of the public REF 2021 submissions dataset, produced by Jisc, which contains metadata for all outputs submitted to the exercise. Metadata has been cleaned and new fields have been added to increase the potential for analytical purposes, e.g.

by identifying where the publisher exists as an imprint of a larger parent company. For its own analytical purposes, Jisc focused on long-form output types (books and parts of books), but cleaning measures were performed on the entire dataset, uploaded here. Good Practice in Submitting Software Outputs to REF2021 The following guidance on good practice in submitting software outputs to REF 2021 has been developed by the UK Software Sustainability Institute in consultation with REF 2021 Sub-panel 11. It should be read in conjunction with the information already provided in the Guidance on Submissions (REF 2019/01, Annex K) and Panel Criteria and Working Methods (REF 2019/02, Paragraph 254 and Annex B). The submission should be in the form of a PDF that provides key information on the software (no length limit, within reason).

To ensure the sub panel has enough information to assess the submission, it should include the following components DOI/URL pointing to a code repository or deposit in a digital repository containing: Where the submitted software is part of a larger code base (e.g. a library contributed to an open source project) it must be clear which part the submission refers to. Ideally, the DOI/URL should reference a specific version of the software. The REF website uses cookies to make the site more efficient.

Find out more about cookies and how we use them. document.write('<span class="close" title="Close">x<\/span>'); The information on this page will enable institutions to prepare data to import to the REF submission system and provides further details of the data required in submissions, extending the guidance provided in the... The information in these documents may change to reflect any amendments to the submission system, which is currently under development. Any changes will be highlighted in subsequent versions of the documents. For further information on the REF 2021 Submission system please visit the submission system page.

This document provides details of the structure of the import/export file formats, including the names of the tables and fields and details of the expected data types and field lengths. It should be read in conjunction with the ‘Guidance on submissions’ and ‘Panel criteria’. The REF website uses cookies to make the site more efficient. Find out more about cookies and how we use them. document.write('<span class="close" title="Close">x<\/span>'); Detailed guidance for the REF 2021 website.

The information on this page provides a guide for the website of the 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF), published on 12 May 2022. You are here: Home > Results and submissions > Submitted outputs' details You are here: Home > Results and submissions > Submitted outputs' details. From the submitted outputs’ details page, you can perform a handful of actions:

People Also Search

The REF Website Uses Cookies To Make The Site More

The REF website uses cookies to make the site more efficient. Find out more about cookies and how we use them. document.write('<span class="close" title="Close">x<\/span>'); The charts below show the number of submissions made and the numbers of staff, outputs and impact case studies included in submissions. These data are available for all panels and by main panel. Where relevant, the numbers sub...

In Line With The New Requirement For HEIs To Return

In line with the new requirement for HEIs to return all staff with significant responsibility for research in REF 2021, the total number of full-time equivalent (FTE) staff returned has increased by 46 per... The REF 2021 Data Explorer is an interactive web platform developed to support transparent and insightful analysis of the UK’s 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF) results. The REF is a n...

The Site Allows Users To Filter And Compare Across Institutions

The site allows users to filter and compare across institutions and units of assessment, and to explore key indicators such as research outputs, doctoral degrees awarded, research income (including in-kind), and both institutional and... It provides a user-friendly interface for researchers, analysts, and policymakers to engage meaningfully with the data that informs UK research funding and strate...

By Identifying Where The Publisher Exists As An Imprint Of

by identifying where the publisher exists as an imprint of a larger parent company. For its own analytical purposes, Jisc focused on long-form output types (books and parts of books), but cleaning measures were performed on the entire dataset, uploaded here. Good Practice in Submitting Software Outputs to REF2021 The following guidance on good practice in submitting software outputs to REF 2021 ha...

To Ensure The Sub Panel Has Enough Information To Assess

To ensure the sub panel has enough information to assess the submission, it should include the following components DOI/URL pointing to a code repository or deposit in a digital repository containing: Where the submitted software is part of a larger code base (e.g. a library contributed to an open source project) it must be clear which part the submission refers to. Ideally, the DOI/URL should ref...