Unit 6 2 Learning Rates And Learning Rate Schedulers Part 1

Log in or create a free Lightning.ai account to track your progress and access additional course materials Get Started → Tuner documentation for learning rate finding configure_optimizers dictionary documentation CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts documentation In this lecture, we introduced three different kinds of learning rate schedulers: step schedulers, on-plateau schedulers, and cosine decay schedulers. They all have in common that they decay the learning rate over time to achieve better annealing — making the loss less jittery or jumpy towards the end of the training.

In this article, we discuss the need for learning rate schedulers, review the most popular ones, and provide guidelines for when to use each type. Training a neural network involves tuning numerous hyperparameters. Among them, the learning rate stands out as a pivot as it directly impacts the speed and effectiveness of the learning process. It denotes the degree of correction applied after each training step, i.e., the magnitude of adjustments made to the model’s parameters during optimization. The bigger the learning rate, the bigger the changes at each step. The magnitude of the learning rate depends on several factors, including the optimization algorithm, model complexity and architecture, number of epochs, and batch size, that collectively influence the pace at which the model learns...

A low rate can slow down or even halt the learning process, whereas a high rate may lead to oscillations and constant overshooting of the minimum, so the model may never learn. Achieving an optimal learning rate involves balancing between these two extremes: it should be sufficiently large to ensure fast convergence, yet not excessively large to cause erratic oscillations (Figure 1). When it comes to optimizing the learning rate, there are two primary approaches: Learning rate schedulers provide a systematic approach to change the learning rate over time, allowing for more effective optimization. Typically, these schedulers progressively decrease the learning rate as training advances. This strategy allows the model to make larger updates during the initial training stages when model parameters are far from their optimal values.

Subsequently, as parameters approach their optimums, the scheduler enables smaller updates, allowing for more precise adjustments. A Gentle Introduction to Learning Rate SchedulersImage by Author | ChatGPT Ever wondered why your neural network seems to get stuck during training, or why it starts strong but fails to reach its full potential? The culprit might be your learning rate – arguably one of the most important hyperparameters in machine learning. While a fixed learning rate can work, it often leads to suboptimal results. Learning rate schedulers offer a more dynamic approach by automatically adjusting the learning rate during training.

In this article, you’ll discover five popular learning rate schedulers through clear visualizations and hands-on examples. You’ll learn when to use each scheduler, see their behavior patterns, and understand how they can improve your model’s performance. We’ll start with the basics, explore sklearn’s approach versus deep learning requirements, then move to practical implementation using the MNIST dataset. By the end, you’ll have both the theoretical understanding and practical code to start using learning rate schedulers in your own projects. Imagine you’re hiking down a mountain in thick fog, trying to reach the valley. The learning rate is like your step size – take steps too large, and you might overshoot the valley or bounce between mountainsides.

Take steps too small, and you’ll move painfully slowly, possibly getting stuck on a ledge before reaching the bottom. In the realm of deep learning, PyTorch stands as a beacon, illuminating the path for researchers and practitioners to traverse the complex landscapes of artificial intelligence. Its dynamic computational graph and user-friendly interface have solidified its position as a preferred framework for developing neural networks. As we delve into the nuances of model training, one essential aspect that demands meticulous attention is the learning rate. To navigate the fluctuating terrains of optimization effectively, PyTorch introduces a potent ally—the learning rate scheduler. This article aims to demystify the PyTorch learning rate scheduler, providing insights into its syntax, parameters, and indispensable role in enhancing the efficiency and efficacy of model training.

PyTorch, an open-source machine learning library, has gained immense popularity for its dynamic computation graph and ease of use. Developed by Facebook's AI Research lab (FAIR), PyTorch has become a go-to framework for building and training deep learning models. Its flexibility and dynamic nature make it particularly well-suited for research and experimentation, allowing practitioners to iterate swiftly and explore innovative approaches in the ever-evolving field of artificial intelligence. At the heart of effective model training lies the learning rate—a hyperparameter crucial for controlling the step size during optimization. PyTorch provides a sophisticated mechanism, known as the learning rate scheduler, to dynamically adjust this hyperparameter as the training progresses. The syntax for incorporating a learning rate scheduler into your PyTorch training pipeline is both intuitive and flexible.

At its core, the scheduler is integrated into the optimizer, working hand in hand to regulate the learning rate based on predefined policies. The typical syntax for implementing a learning rate scheduler involves instantiating an optimizer and a scheduler, then stepping through epochs or batches, updating the learning rate accordingly. The versatility of the scheduler is reflected in its ability to accommodate various parameters, allowing practitioners to tailor its behavior to meet specific training requirements. The importance of learning rate schedulers becomes evident when considering the dynamic nature of model training. As models traverse complex loss landscapes, a fixed learning rate may hinder convergence or cause overshooting. Learning rate schedulers address this challenge by adapting the learning rate based on the model's performance during training.

This adaptability is crucial for avoiding divergence, accelerating convergence, and facilitating the discovery of optimal model parameters. The provided test accuracy of approximately 95.6% suggests that the trained neural network model performs well on the test set. So far we primarily focused on optimization algorithms for how to update the weight vectors rather than on the rate at which they are being updated. Nonetheless, adjusting the learning rate is often just as important as the actual algorithm. There are a number of aspects to consider: Most obviously the magnitude of the learning rate matters.

If it is too large, optimization diverges, if it is too small, it takes too long to train or we end up with a suboptimal result. We saw previously that the condition number of the problem matters (see e.g., Section 12.6 for details). Intuitively it is the ratio of the amount of change in the least sensitive direction vs. the most sensitive one. Secondly, the rate of decay is just as important. If the learning rate remains large we may simply end up bouncing around the minimum and thus not reach optimality.

Section 12.5 discussed this in some detail and we analyzed performance guarantees in Section 12.4. In short, we want the rate to decay, but probably more slowly than \(\mathcal{O}(t^{-\frac{1}{2}})\) which would be a good choice for convex problems. Another aspect that is equally important is initialization. This pertains both to how the parameters are set initially (review Section 5.4 for details) and also how they evolve initially. This goes under the moniker of warmup, i.e., how rapidly we start moving towards the solution initially. Large steps in the beginning might not be beneficial, in particular since the initial set of parameters is random.

The initial update directions might be quite meaningless, too. Lastly, there are a number of optimization variants that perform cyclical learning rate adjustment. This is beyond the scope of the current chapter. We recommend the reader to review details in Izmailov et al. (2018), e.g., how to obtain better solutions by averaging over an entire path of parameters. When training a deep learning model, setting an appropriate learning rate is crucial.

Typically kept constant, the learning rate governs the size of parameter updates during each training iteration. However, with vast training data, a small learning rate can slow convergence towards the optimal solution, hampering exploration of the parameter space and risking entrapment in local minima. Conversely, a larger learning rate may destabilize the optimization process, leading to overshooting and convergence difficulties. To address these challenges, fixed learning rates may not suffice. Instead, employing dynamic learning rate schedulers proves beneficial. These schedulers enable adjusting the learning rate throughout training, facilitating larger strides during initial optimization phases and smaller steps as convergence approaches.

Think of it as sprinting towards Mordor but proceeding cautiously near Mount Doom. Learning rate schedulers come in various types, each tailored to different training scenarios. By dynamically adapting the learning rate, these schedulers optimize the training process for improved convergence and model performance. Let’s explore some common types with accompanying Python code examples: 2. ReduceLROnPlateau: Learning rate is reduced when a monitored quantity has stopped improving.

Code example below uses validation loss as monitored quantity. 3. CosineAnnealingLR: Learning rate follows a cosine annealing schedule. Neural network training fails when learning rates stay constant throughout epochs. Static learning rates cause slow convergence or unstable training dynamics. Learning rate scheduling solves this problem by adjusting rates during training.

This guide compares three popular scheduling methods: cosine decay, linear decay, and exponential decay. You'll learn implementation details, performance characteristics, and selection criteria for each approach. Learning rate scheduling dynamically adjusts the learning rate during neural network training. The scheduler reduces learning rates as training progresses, allowing models to converge more effectively. Key benefits of learning rate scheduling: Cosine decay follows a cosine curve pattern, starting high and gradually decreasing to zero.

This smooth transition provides excellent convergence properties for deep learning models. Researchers generally agree that neural network models are difficult to train. One of the biggest issues is the large number of hyperparameters to specify and optimize. The list goes on, including the number of hidden layers, activation functions, optimizers, learning rate, and regularization. Tuning these hyperparameters can significantly improve neural network models. For us, as data scientists, building neural network models is about solving an optimization problem.

People Also Search

• Unit 6.2 | Learning Rates and Learning Rate Schedulers | Part 1 ...
• Unit 6.2 - Learning Rates and Learning Rate Schedulers - Lightning AI
• Learning Rates and Learning Rate Schedulers - Part 1 - LinkedIn
• A Gentle Introduction to Learning Rate Schedulers
• PDF LearningRateSchedulers
• Understanding PyTorch Learning Rate Scheduling - GeeksforGeeks
• 12.11. Learning Rate Scheduling — Dive into Deep Learning 1.0.3 ... - D2L
• Learning Rate Schedulers. When training a deep learning model… | by ...
• Learning Rate Scheduling: Cosine vs Linear vs Exponential Decay for ...
• How to Choose a Learning Rate Scheduler for Neural Networks