Managing The Three Cs Of Academic Literature Authorship

Leo Migdal

-Dec 5, 2025, 7:02 PM

managing the three cs of academic literature authorship

Dissemination of information through publications is central to academic research, as well as professional advancement. Although seemingly a straightforward endeavor, publication authorship may present challenges. Although the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors defines authorship based on 4 required criteria, contemporary interdisciplinary collaborations can complicate authorship determinations. However, communication that occurs early and frequently in the research and writing process can help to prevent or mitigate potential conflicts, while a process for defining authorship contributions can aid in awarding proper credit. The Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) defines 14 essential roles of manuscript authors that can be utilized to characterize individual author contributions toward any given publication. This information is useful for academic administrators when evaluating contributors of faculty during promotion and tenure decisions.

In the era of collaborative scientific, clinical, and pedagogical scholarship, providing faculty development, including statements of credit in the published work, and developing institutional systems to capture and assess contributions are key. Keywords: Authorship; Collaborative; Conflict; Contributions; Credit. Copyright © 2023 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Declaration of Competing Interest Researchers involved in this study do not have any actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

Authorship provides credit for an individual’s contributions to a study and carries accountability. There are no universally accepted standards for assigning authorship, and principles, customs and practices differ significantly from one discipline to another. Responsibility for decisions regarding the authorship of publications lies with those who carried out the work reported in the publication. Researchers should be aware of the authorship practices within their own disciplines and should always abide by any requirements stipulated by journals as part of their instructions to authors. Where no journal or discipline-specific norms apply, authorship criteria should be agreed by all investigators at an early stage of the research. Where possible, it is advisable to keep written records of decisions regarding authorship and these should be revisited where roles and contributions change over the lifecycle of the study.

Normally, an author is an individual judged to have made a substantial intellectual or practical contribution to a publication and who agrees to be accountable for that contribution. This would normally include anyone who has: made a significant contribution to the conception or design of the project or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND/OR How do you decide who gets credit as an author in your article and who receives an acknowledgement in your paper? There are guidelines available to help you decide. Before starting a new project, decide amongst the team who will receive credit as an author and in what order, to avoid conflict later.

Prior to submitting your manuscript for publication, or as the project changes, confirm this list and the order of authors. Teaching for Transformation has an Online Supplement about Ethical Research Collaboration that "will introduce the authorship guidelines used by most leading health journals [and] explore their limitations and how factors such as culture, power,... International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals (ICMJE Recommendations) [Internet]. ICMJE; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 21]. University Health Network, Research Authorship (Policy 40.60.001).

Toronto; 2022. Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, et al.The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research. Journal of Investigative Medicine 2007;55:174-180. Each time you publish an academic paper, you’re presenting new information or a new perspective. Often you’ll need to convince critics that your research is solid and explain new concepts to readers unfamiliar with your field of expertise. How you convey that information is crucial.

The language you use and the way you present your work to your readers will determine how well your paper is received, the impact of your research, and even how often it is cited... Before you draft your next paper, consider the three C's: Make sure your writing is clear, concise, and conversational. The first thing you need to be clear about is your target audience: Are your readers experts in the same field as you or are you writing for a more general audience? Do you speak the same language? In many cases, you will want to write for a global audience to have your research reach the widest readership, so writing clearly also means using language that is simple enough for non-native speakers... Another reason to strive for clarity above all else is that half of the communication between you and your readers lies in how they process what you have written; the message they receive needs...

If readers misinterpret your message, then all of your impressive research will have been in vain. Determining authorship is an important component of upholding the integrity of the research and scholarly enterprise and serves as an explicit way of assigning responsibility and giving credit for intellectual work. Only by honestly reflecting the contribution of all members of the research team can there be sustained growth in the discipline and proper credit directed to scholars for their efforts. Fair and equitable determination of authorship is also important to the reputation, academic promotion, and funding support of the individuals involved, and to the strength and reputation of the authors’ respective institutions. Disagreements may arise regarding who should be named as an author or contributor to intellectual work and the order in which individuals should be listed. These Guidelines are meant to serve as a set of standards that are shared by the academic community as a whole in order to help facilitate open communication through the adherence to common principles.

These principles apply to all intellectual products, whether published or prepared for internal use or for broad dissemination. These Guidelines apply to all faculty, students postdoctoral researchers, and staff. Ownership of research data and materials resulting from Harvard University (“University”) research activities rests with the University (see Research Data Ownership Policy). Designing an ethical and transparent approach to authorship and publication of research, whether in a peer-reviewed journal or in an open access e-print or pre-print repository (e.g., arXiv, PsyArXiv), is a shared responsibility of... The University recognizes that there are different standards across disciplines regarding authorship and the order in which authors are listed or acknowledged. Additionally, journals often specify their requirements in their guidance for authors and require attestations regarding individual authors intellectual contributions to the work.

As a result, each laboratory, department, and/or school should engage in conversations regarding their own discipline-specific standards of authorship and, if needed, are encouraged to supplement the Guidelines herein with a description of these... Note that these Guidelines are not intended for allegations related to research misconduct, defined as fabrication or falsification of data or plagiarism, which are subject to the Procedures for Responding to Allegations of Misconduct... Determining who qualifies as an author on a scholarly work—and in what order—can be one of the most complex and consequential aspects of academic publishing. Questions of authorship touch on professional ethics, disciplinary norms, collaboration dynamics, and institutional expectations. As research becomes increasingly interdisciplinary and collaborative, the need for clarity around authorship roles, responsibilities, and agreements has never been greater. This guide, developed in collaboration with Dr.

Alice Young and Dr. Casside Street, brings together a wide range of resources to support researchers, students, and faculty in navigating the multifaceted landscape of academic authorship. Topics include definitions of authorship, contributor roles and taxonomies, authorship agreements, common sources of dispute, and how to address misconduct. Whether you are preparing your first manuscript, mentoring students, or managing collaborative research teams, this guide is designed to help you foster transparency, accountability, and fairness in your publishing practices.

Managing The Three Cs Of Academic Literature Authorship

People Also Search

Dissemination Of Information Through Publications Is Central To Academic Research,

In The Era Of Collaborative Scientific, Clinical, And Pedagogical Scholarship,

Authorship Provides Credit For An Individual’s Contributions To A Study

Normally, An Author Is An Individual Judged To Have Made

Prior To Submitting Your Manuscript For Publication, Or As The